Forums (I/O Tower)
Forums 
  General Discussion 
 Why "The Games"


New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
AuthorComments:  Page: of 2 PagesNextLast
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 10:15 AM


I was thinking... why did the MCP hold the games to begin with? If the MCP wanted to take over the functions of programs he could do that and then derez them, like he did Clu or the old men at the end.

Which leads me to believe that the MCP took some kind of gladiatorial pleasure in the spectacle of the games. We see Sark, an extension of the MCP's programming, actually take pleasure in hearing a program from the SAC was being appropriated for the games.


This means that not only was the MCP evil, in his greed for power, but he also had a perverse side to him, a very interesting and complicated emotion for a computer.

Anyone else have any thoughts on the matter?
order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill


 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 11:48 AM
Here's what I think:

Sark was never truely evil. The whole reasoning behind this hangs on several actions he does when Flynn was rezzed in the system.

The first being the most important is Sark's comment to the MCP about Flynn and the Users. Seing as the MCP has no actual "spiritual" belief in the Users like the other programs from the "blue side," he forces his beliefs on to his followers. This would include Sark who still holds a form of belief in the Users making him very reluctant to harm Flynn. However, he is forced to do so by the MCP punishing him for Sark's comment. According to certain developmental theories, reward and punishment re-inforces certain behaviors. So the MCP re-inforcing certain anti-Users actions via punishment/reward can gurantee that these "guides" set out by the MCP can be followed.

After that event, Sark had plenty of opportunities to "derez" Flynn. One such example was when Flynn was in the ring games with Chrom. Sark had the opportunity to derez Flynn right then and there by shutting off Flynn's platform thus derezzing Flynn. Because of Sark's belief in the Users and his full knowledge that Flynn is a User, Sark is reluctant and "saves" Flynn. This shows that when the MCP is NOT directly present, Sark will act on his own sometimes according to his values and beliefs which includes the Users belief. Prior to putting Flynn in the ring game, Sark himself could have gone in to one of the games with Flynn and derezzed him that way since it is apparent at the begining of the movie that Sark also participated in the games and is arrogant and overconfident about his skills. But again, because of his beliefs, he didn't do that.

Another event that suggests Sark's User beliefs was when he left Flynn on his carrier when it was derezzing. There were a numerous amount of opportunties when he could have derezzed Flynn. Sark definately had the means of doing that to Flynn in person but again, never did. Instead, he derezzed his carrier with Flynn on board. The reason to this (based on the nature of Sark's psychological state that was metioned in the paragraphs prior) is that he never wanted to see Flynn derezzed because deep inside Sark, he knows very well that this is very wrong. Since he could not face the MCP without having Flynn gone, Sark, as it would seem, fled with the "prisoners" to avoid having to see this. In otherwords, he was acting out of guilt.

Then comes to the final scenes when Sark was talking to Tron in the disk-fight. Sark mentions to Tron about joining the MCP to become much more powerful. This suggests Sark's motive for joining the MCP. Prior to Sark joining the MCP, Sark felt that he wasn't nearly as powerful as he wanted and went seeking it which brought himto the MCP who probably promised Sark power in exchange for his services. This situation seems to be quite similar to the situation presented to Haku in Spirited Away. In that movie, Haku (like Sark) quested for power which brought him to the nasty owner of the Inn and eventually, in her power.

So it would so seem that Sark couldn't totally act as an individual with the MCP around. When the MCP wasn't present, Sark could somewhat act on his own, but to an extent. So in otherwords, Sark was trapped by the MCP. While he liked the idea of power, he was scared of the MCP and of course punishment.

Because of this, it can be said and summed up that Sark indeed does have a good side to him but also a very dominant bad side. This suggests a yin-yang prinicpal where, yes, there's Sark's ever-dominant potential for evil as well as a little bit of potential for good.

Because off all that was said here, this makes Sark a very interesting character to me (Which explains why he pops up in my art a lot) but this leads me to my final question for the moment: If there was no MCP, how would Sark act if he were completely alone?

Anyways, that's my two bits for now. (Which I've been mulling around in my head for weeks! ^^;; ) abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
Vortex.EXE
User

Posts: 471
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 12:26 PM
...correct me if I am wrong, I don't claim to be a Tron guru, but, in the ring game, Sark, being ticked at Flynn, went to push the button, but stopped because he remembered that the MCP said, "I want him in the game until he dies playing." I acknowledge the fact that he is arrogant, and a little afraid of the users, but I don't think he spared Flynn out of his own pity, but out of fear of the MCP.

...just a thought...


 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 1:03 PM
Vortex.EXE Wrote:...correct me if I am wrong, I don't claim to be a Tron guru, but, in the ring game, Sark, being ticked at Flynn, went to push the button, but stopped because he remembered that the MCP said, "I want him in the game until he dies playing." I acknowledge the fact that he is arrogant, and a little afraid of the users, but I don't think he spared Flynn out of his own pity, but out of fear of the MCP.

...just a thought...

He was "ticked" you're right, but could also very well say that Flynn was in the games and he did die playing... because technically he was in the game and by pressing that button, Flynn would have died in the game. So Flynn would have died in the game. In otherwords, Flynn would have died playing. Sark definately had the opportunity but never took it. This brings us back to Sark's origional comment about Users being his creators. Sark has a lot of difficulty killing his own creators (using the word creators and users as general terms. I'm not defining any one user/creator because Sark never did and he used that term very generally) and it would seem to be one of his fatal flaws. So he does have a conicence which it would seem comes back to haunt him because as you well know, if it weren't for Flynn leaping in to the MCP cone, Tron would have never gotten his chance and if Sark did derez Flynn, Tron would not be successful.

~Kamui.EXE
order abortion pill morning after pill price where to buy abortion pill

===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 1:05 PM


Yes, I agree with Vortex. Sark doubted the MCP's decision out of fear of having to deal with a User, not out of any reverence to them. However, his fear of the MCP was greater and he gave in to the idea of bringing a user down to the game grid.
I also believe, yes, Sark did not derez flynn out of fear of punishment from the MCP.

As to why Sark derezed the ship, I'm not sure, except to say that it gave a convenient way for the plot to allow Flynn to escape. Maybe the ship went out of its allowed boundries or something... but I really dont think Sark was taking pity on Flynn.

As to what Sark was or if he even existed before the MCP... I dunno... would make a good fan fiction maybe. But unlike Star Wars where you get the sense from the story line that there was some good in Vader to be redeemed, I really never felt that about Sark at all. He was a baddie.

abortion pills online http://www.kvicksundscupen.se/template/default.aspx?abortion-questions cytotec abortion


 
spiritquest
User

Posts: 6
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 1:37 PM
Kamui and Vortex both have good points.

And I see Sark's behaviour to be torn between the two in both cases.

Torn between his fear/reverence of the Users, his anger at having been ordered to deal with a User by the MCP, and his fear that he may not be able to beat a user fairly on the game grid opposed to his fear /anger towards being punished by the MCP. All possibilities. All thought provoking.

I like your reference to Spirited Away, Kamui, great animation. I like Studio Ghibli

I can see how the Corruption of Sark compares, although Haku was much more sympathetic.

I think the difference here is that Sark was a program written by Dillenger, the MCP began as a program written by Dillenger, which integrated other programs into itself, as a piece of living AI.

Sark and the MCP have very close ties I think, at the core of who they calculate themselves to be

BTW I bought the Japanses Import with the DTS soundtrack on it, not watched that beauty yet !

abortion pills online http://www.kvicksundscupen.se/template/default.aspx?abortion-questions cytotec abortion

Ket
 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 1:38 PM
Boingo_Buzzard Wrote:

Yes, I agree with Vortex. Sark doubted the MCP's decision out of fear of having to deal with a User, not out of any reverence to them. However, his fear of the MCP was greater and he gave in to the idea of bringing a user down to the game grid.
I also believe, yes, Sark did not derez flynn out of fear of punishment from the MCP.

As to why Sark derezed the ship, I'm not sure, except to say that it gave a convenient way for the plot to allow Flynn to escape. Maybe the ship went out of its allowed boundries or something... but I really dont think Sark was taking pity on Flynn.

As to what Sark was or if he even existed before the MCP... I dunno... would make a good fan fiction maybe. But unlike Star Wars where you get the sense from the story line that there was some good in Vader to be redeemed, I really never felt that about Sark at all. He was a baddie.



But there were tones of opportunities where he could have done Flynn in and didn't.

There are very few times where there is an extreme bad and an extreme good. Which comes back to the yin-yang prinicple where there is a little bit of bad in good and a little bit of good in bad. The only character that this doesn't really apply to is the MCP who can easily be defined as the ultimate evil and pretty much the only extreme example.

Sark is also indeed a cowardice... a very arrogant cowardice... but he's done some "good" things out of cowardice like the Flynn examples. So it could very well be a combination of fear, guilt, and a User-belief. Sark does believe in the Users like quite a few of the other programs in the movie. This brings me back to the reward and punishment scenario. When Sark made the comment about Users as creators thus showing a sense of guilt, he was imediately punished by the MCP which reinforces Sark's negative behavior.

An example of the reward-punishment situation is a study done with children. While not all of this applies, quite a fair bit does. Anyways, within the study, children watched a TV show where a doll was being attacked. Then the children were given a doll. The children then attacked the doll like they saw on TV (The TV watching part doesn't really apply to Sark unless he secretly love to watch TV.... then again.... there's no proof of that... for all we know, Sark could be an avid soap opera watcher! ) then the children were divided up. One half was punished while the other half was rewarded. When the children came back, those who were punished for attacking the doll did not attack the doll; while the children who were rewarded for attacking the doll continued to attack the doll. This relates to Sark in the fact that the MCP punishes certain behaviors and rewards others, thus reinforcing certain behaviors.

So Sark could have very well started off good long before the movie began and long before he met the MCP. But because of the reward-punishment system, Sark's negative behaviors were reinforced. We only sometimes see some of the old disencouraged behaviors leak through from time to time.

~kamui.EXE

===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 2:51 PM
spiritquest Wrote:Kamui and Vortex both have good points.

And I see Sark's behaviour to be torn between the two in both cases.

Torn between his fear/reverence of the Users, his anger at having been ordered to deal with a User by the MCP, and his fear that he may not be able to beat a user fairly on the game grid opposed to his fear /anger towards being punished by the MCP. All possibilities. All thought provoking.

I like your reference to Spirited Away, Kamui, great animation. I like Studio Ghibli

I can see how the Corruption of Sark compares, although Haku was much more sympathetic.

I think the difference here is that Sark was a program written by Dillenger, the MCP began as a program written by Dillenger, which integrated other programs into itself, as a piece of living AI.

Sark and the MCP have very close ties I think, at the core of who they calculate themselves to be

BTW I bought the Japanses Import with the DTS soundtrack on it, not watched that beauty yet !


Double post... I know.

You're right about Haku's case being much more sympathetic. It's kinda difficult to be sympathetic towards Sark.

Hmm..... maybe I should consider an alternate carreer as Sark's psychologist.

*Writes down on a note pad: "Just plain INSANE!"*

Nah.... maybe not... who knows what emotional dribble I'd get out of that.....

But all kidding aside, these features as so previously described seems to make Sark very interesting. He's a very interesting character.... and quite emotional all things considered. He's definately got quite a few "issues."

~Kamui.EXE
where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online

===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
spiritquest
User

Posts: 6
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 3:08 PM
Hmm..... maybe I should consider an alternate carreer as Sark's psychologist.

Now that'd need to be one major program !

Maybe if we all held a 'Sing-a-long-a-Sark' night, he'd start to feel much better with himself, and make something of his program

Ket
 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 3:18 PM
spiritquest Wrote:
Hmm..... maybe I should consider an alternate carreer as Sark's psychologist.

Now that'd need to be one major program !

Maybe if we all held a 'Sing-a-long-a-Sark' night, he'd start to feel much better with himself, and make something of his program

Ah yes! I see an interesting picture coming on!

A 'Sing-a-long-a-Sark' night! Classic! I can just see him getting all teary eyed and satisfactorly saying "Thank you! Now I'm my own program! I'm special!"

~Kamui.EXE

===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 3:19 PM
But there were tones of opportunities where he could have done Flynn in and didn't.

Well, in all fairness, Flynn WAS the main character of the film, and wasn't going to bite it, one way or the other.

"good" things out of cowardice like the Flynn examples.

I am not a believer "The Ends Justify The Means"

When Sark made the comment about Users as creators thus showing a sense of guilt,

I still maintain this was out of fear and not guilt.

So Sark could have very well started off good long before the movie began and long before he met the MCP.~kamui.EXE

Absolutely. Even the MCP was a pretty amicable chess program, remember? I guess I am not a follower of the theory that there's good in your actions even if you mean to do evil while doing them. That's kind of a "innocent by reason of insanity" defense

And this got away from the topic of the games themselves, dagnabbit!





 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Friday, February, 25, 2005 3:46 PM
Boingo_Buzzard Wrote:
But there were tones of opportunities where he could have done Flynn in and didn't.

Well, in all fairness, Flynn WAS the main character of the film, and wasn't going to bite it, one way or the other.

"good" things out of cowardice like the Flynn examples.

I am not a believer "The Ends Justify The Means"

When Sark made the comment about Users as creators thus showing a sense of guilt,

I still maintain this was out of fear and not guilt.

So Sark could have very well started off good long before the movie began and long before he met the MCP.~kamui.EXE

Absolutely. Even the MCP was a pretty amicable chess program, remember? I guess I am not a follower of the theory that there's good in your actions even if you mean to do evil while doing them. That's kind of a "innocent by reason of insanity" defense

And this got away from the topic of the games themselves, dagnabbit!




Yes! I'm the stealer of topics! FEAR ME!

Anyways it could be a fear/guilt combo. Let's not rule that one out.

But here's another question: Why did the MCP get so PO'ed about humans? And how?

I think something must have happened there. And for some reason, I think Dillenger was involved.

~Kamui.EXE

===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
TronFAQ
Sector Admin

Posts: 4,467
Re: Why "The Games"

on Saturday, February, 26, 2005 10:31 AM


Boingo_Buzzard Wrote:
Well, in all fairness, Flynn WAS the main character of the film, and wasn't going to bite it, one way or the other.
Heh. That kind of puts a damper on my next comment, but here goes anyway . . .

I'm wondering if Flynn could have been de-rezzed at all. Or, at least, at what point he couldn't be de-rezzed any more.

When he's first brought into the system, his abilities are probably the same as any other program. But as time passes, his abilities grow and he discovers that he has great power. By the end of the film, he's able to stick his arm into a beam of energy and even jump into the MCP itself, and not be de-rezzed. He also doesn't get de-rezzed along with the rest of Sark's carrier, and saves Yori to boot.

So I'm thinking that if there was any chance to de-rezz Flynn, it would have to have been done quickly. Because once he found that energy pool, that seemed to be what awakened the dormant User powers within him. And at that point, he could no longer be de-rezzed. (A hint in this direction is the fact that Ram dies, but Flynn doesn't.)



LDSOFacebookTwitterYouTubeDeviantArt

 
spiritquest
User

Posts: 6
Re: Why "The Games"

on Saturday, February, 26, 2005 12:15 PM
I have thought this concept through as well, and he probably couldn't be derezzed like a normal program, maybe his digitzed molecules would just be thrown back out .. hard to say what might happen ..

lucky there wasn't a powercut at the encom building

Ket
 
Vortex.EXE
User

Posts: 471
Re: Why "The Games"

on Saturday, February, 26, 2005 7:03 PM
...ok...about the original topic...

Ram told Crom that if the MCP thought you were useful, he absorbs you into his system...if not he sends you to the games...this does support a sadistic joy in watching programs duke it out. I think the main thing about this is that he wanted to show that his "Warrior Elite" were better than any other programs... the games also being punishment for believers...

..again...just a thought...


 
harpo989
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Sunday, February, 27, 2005 1:00 AM
Did anyone consider Sark's briefing? perhaps the MCP lets programs play games until they can't 'take it' or are just to afraid to play games in the first place and join the MCP's cronies.
Probably not a lot of programs willing to give up their beleif in the users, but that's not to say there arenone...abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion

------------
Harpo989: The original fConer. (Now with (0rr[up73d fruit flavoring!)
 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Sunday, February, 27, 2005 1:21 PM
True... those are both good points. Maybe the MCP's way of weeding out (in his mind) the strong ones who are worthy to serve him.




 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Monday, February, 28, 2005 9:11 AM
redrain85 Wrote:

Boingo_Buzzard Wrote:
Well, in all fairness, Flynn WAS the main character of the film, and wasn't going to bite it, one way or the other.
Heh. That kind of puts a damper on my next comment, but here goes anyway . . .

I'm wondering if Flynn could have been de-rezzed at all. Or, at least, at what point he couldn't be de-rezzed any more.

When he's first brought into the system, his abilities are probably the same as any other program. But as time passes, his abilities grow and he discovers that he has great power. By the end of the film, he's able to stick his arm into a beam of energy and even jump into the MCP itself, and not be de-rezzed. He also doesn't get de-rezzed along with the rest of Sark's carrier, and saves Yori to boot.

So I'm thinking that if there was any chance to de-rezz Flynn, it would have to have been done quickly. Because once he found that energy pool, that seemed to be what awakened the dormant User powers within him. And at that point, he could no longer be de-rezzed. (A hint in this direction is the fact that Ram dies, but Flynn doesn't.)


Suspicion: The MCP wouldn't have rezzed Flynn in if he didn't think Flynn could be killed. So I guess the general assuption on the programs behalf is that Flynn could be "derezzed" for good.

~Kamui.EXE


===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
TronFAQ
Sector Admin

Posts: 4,467
Re: Why "The Games"

on Wednesday, March, 02, 2005 4:51 PM
Kamui Wrote:Suspicion: The MCP wouldn't have rezzed Flynn in if he didn't think Flynn could be killed. So I guess the general assuption on the programs behalf is that Flynn could be "derezzed" for good.
But how could the MCP know that for sure. He'd never brought a User into his world until that point. If you'll pardon the pun, Flynn was an unknown variable. The MCP had no way of knowing one way or the other, without testing that assumption. Which he did, by putting him in the games.

Also, like I said . . . it's possible that Flynn was susceptible at first. Maybe if Sark had hit that button, that would have been the end of Flynn at that point.

But the evidence in the film later, suggests Flynn was no longer susceptible.



LDSOFacebookTwitterYouTubeDeviantArt

 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Why "The Games"

on Wednesday, March, 02, 2005 5:42 PM


Yeah, Flynn did seem immortal. He didn't die when Ram did. He didn't derez but putting his arm into a beam of energy, and jumping into the MCP didn't kill him.

Seems somewhat godlike to me.




 
 Page: of 2 PagesNextLast
New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
Forums 
  General Discussion 
 Why "The Games"