Forums (I/O Tower)
Forums 
  General Discussion 
 Michael Fremer article


New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
AuthorComments:  Page: of 1 Page
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Michael Fremer article

on Monday, May, 09, 2005 11:57 PM
Great article. It's funny. After 23 years I have come, somewhat, to take the filmmaking aspect of Tron for granted. I mean, I watch the movie and it's amazing as always, but you really lose scope of how much hell and hard work these people went through to make this movie.

I, for one, am glad they put all the effort into it that they did. I think they are all wizards, because the movie is as sharp and amazing today as it was 23 years ago. It's a testament of how something can hold up over time if you put something into it (like your own SOUL)

So... thanks to everyone who worked on the film for all your hard work and I think we can ALL say how thankful we all are that your efforts came to light. Certainly enriched my life, I'll tell yaabortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion


 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Michael Fremer article

on Tuesday, May, 10, 2005 12:03 AM


Of course... I do disagree with this...

"Tron was a box-office flop. Though the concept was brilliant, the story was shaky, the script was predictable, plodding, and emotionally flat, and the acting, with the exception of Jeff Bridges, was stilted. The female lead, Cindy Morgan, was particularly awful"

I think the story is fine. The script was fine. and not flat and the acting was great for this film. The thing about Cindy Morgan is pretty harsh.

I applaud your efforts but bad mouthing the film was unwarranted.







 
TronFAQ
Sector Admin

Posts: 4,467
Re: Michael Fremer article

on Tuesday, May, 10, 2005 2:44 AM


I don't agree with his assessment either . . . it was rather harsh. I think maybe he's somewhat bitter about his experience working on the film, and he's letting his personal bias show.

A fascinating read, though. Glad the film soundtrack turned out as well as it did, despite what he had to say.

where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online

LDSOFacebookTwitterYouTubeDeviantArt

 
TheReelTodd
Sector Admin

Posts: 0
Re: Michael Fremer article

on Tuesday, May, 10, 2005 6:26 PM
The Michael Fremmer article was an excellent read!

I already knew about many of the troubles the production crew went through on the visual aspect of this groundbreaking film, but I had no idea the audio end of it was just as hectic (and perhaps even more difficult to pull off in the given time frame). It's true - more often than not the audio end of film (occasional exception of the music) goes pretty much unnoticed and un-rewarded... and almost always un-thought about by the audience... that is unless the audio was not up to par, in which case the audience will indeed notice it because it will be something they are unhappy with or find distracting if it was not done right.

Having dabbled in production work myself, I know how difficult it can be to get simple things like dialogue properly captured live. I had no idea they had to pretty much scrap all the on-set dialogue of the inside the computer shots. They really did a great job too, because there were only a few moments in the film I could tell the audio was dubbed (which ALL films have some dubbed audio).

It's too bad that there was pretty much no mention of the audio workings of TRON on the DVD set too. I would have really enjoyed that part.

I'll echo the already mentioned points by Boingo_Buzzard and redrain85 with the exception of the fact that TRON was indeed (and very unfortunately) a box office flop.

Stating that fact does NOT at all detract from the incredible film it is, to this day I'm still not sure how this film did not have the same impact Star Wars had on audiences. It should have been one of the biggest films to hit the screen... but it just went nowhere. I was 11 years old when it came out and clearly remember how excited I was about the film... and also how no one else seemed to be. There wasn't much about it on TV. Only a couple of my friends saw the film, most didn't even care to go see it and looked at me like some kind of weirdo for enjoying it as much as I did. TRON should have brought down the house and amazed the WHOLE world... but instead there was only a small bunch of us who really loved the film back then. I vividly remember wondering "what's wrong with everyone - this film is the BEST!". No sooner than the film came out, than it seemed to just fizzle out and disappear. It made no sense to me then, and only a little sense to me now. I guess the world just wasn't ready for such a fantastic journey.




 
wwwmwww
User

Posts: 1,230
Re: Michael Fremer article

on Tuesday, May, 10, 2005 9:52 PM
That was a great article. Thanks for pointing it out....

Carlorder abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pill


 
Red5
User

Posts: 29
Re: Michael Fremer article

on Thursday, May, 12, 2005 1:09 PM

An excellent feature.

Totally understand his grievience regards not featuring on the DVD. In the Star Wars DVD's, there's a large amount of time dedicated to the sound elements in the film - why not Tron?

For me, the music makes up for 50% of my enjoyment of the movie, and is still, today, one of my most favourite and prized collections of music. In the Tron DVD I was expecting to hear about how the sound was devised for the lightcycles, solar sailer, recognizers etc. And that is one of the most disappointing aspects about the DVD for me.

I'd also like to track the author down so he can answer some of my questions about the scoring. He seems willing to talk. He does seem a bit bitter about the film, but I suspect it's the truth.

If anyone can offer an explanation into the disappearance of commentry of the sound on Tron on the DVD, do let me know.




 
 Page: of 1 Page
New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
Forums 
  General Discussion 
 Michael Fremer article