Forums (I/O Tower)
Forums 
  General Discussion 
 Real time?


New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
AuthorComments:  Page: of 1 Page
foilism
User

Posts: 1,064
Real time?

on Tuesday, May, 31, 2005 9:59 AM
Yo tron-sectoids. I just caught on the telly [BBC2, had no idea it was on] and it got me thinking...

Is the film in real time?? By real time, I mean time passes as it would in the real world. I was thinking this as I watched the solar sailer grace the sea of simulation skies. Someone here once asserted that the solar sailer is like a file attachment, being sent via that energy beam carrying a cuople programs - how ever many it can carry at one time.



Now this got me thinking, it doesn't take that long for my email attachments to reach their destination, so maybe the film is slowed down to view the story.

But games are in real time, we can see the guys at the opening of the film playing lightcycles against sark, who must be in real time.



Most of the other activites apart from I/O contact and video games could relate to the way real systems work, not in real time. therefore do Flynn's adventures in the ENCOM system add up to only 5mins? I dunno -- just a muse, anyone think otherwise I'd like to hear...??


 
Prankster bit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Tuesday, May, 31, 2005 10:24 AM
foilism Wrote:Yo tron-sectoids. I just caught on the telly [BBC2, had no idea it was on] and it got me thinking...

Is the film in real time?? do Flynn's adventures in the ENCOM system add up to only 5mins? I dunno -- just a muse, anyone think otherwise I'd like to hear...??


oh [insert string of anger expletives here]! i missed that!! [more expletives]
well, i suppose that would depend on how powerful the encom computers are[were]. i heard somewhere that time passes *much* quicker in the digital world. so flynn's endeavours[spelling] probably are at maximum 5 minutes [if it was a sloooooow computer] probably a lot shorter if encom invested in top-of-the-range processing power, which it's pretty obvious they do[did] *note the BF laser*

words of wisdom from...

PranKsTeR BiT V2.0



 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Tuesday, May, 31, 2005 4:02 PM


Don't they allude to the fact that time passes more quickly in the computer world in the Tron 2.0 GBA game?

Plus in the movie we see Flynn pass out for a while. How long was he out? We're not sure how much time passed there.

I feel that time would pass "slower" in the computer world.... meaning that you could digitize yourself and come back out in what seemed like 40 years to find that only a fraction of time had passed.

You, of course, would be exactly the same as when you were digitized.

Could be an effective means of travelling into the future, given there is anyone there to pull you out when you want to be extracted.




 
Compucore
User

Posts: 4,450
Re: Real time?

on Tuesday, May, 31, 2005 5:12 PM
Well how we define time in our surroundings is a lot more different than the time in the digital world. In our world we go as far as to the second. Or fraction of a second if you are looking at the Oylmpics when they masure time. In the digital I think goes even further than the basic second and parts of seconds. if you were to define it that far down. Besides being the 24 hour clock. IN the digital world I think its mainly in Cycles. For every so many cycles. is equivilant to xx number of seconds or fractions of a second. I even remember reading somewhere. bout how many instructions are executed by a processot. If I had the articleonline I would also post that. To give an example of it.




order abortion pill http://unclejohnsprojects.com/template/default.aspx?morning-after-pill-price where to buy abortion pillwhere to buy abortion pill ordering abortion pills to be shipped to house buy abortion pill online

2 Legit 2 quit

End of line

Compucore

VROOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!

To compute or not to compute that is the question at hand. Tis nobler to compile in C++ or in TASM.


 
Prankster bit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 5:12 AM
Compucore Wrote: IN the digital world I think its mainly in Cycles. For every so many cycles. is equivilant to xx number of seconds or fractions of a second.

i'm quoting this from Harpo on TU. i think he made it up, but it seems to fit quite well [if you read this, harpo and you didn't make it up. i stand corrected.], the curved brackets are his estimated conversions for telling time in role, and the square brackets are what i think they would roughly compare to in the real world.anyway, here:

Nanocycle = 2 seconds [0.0000045454545454545 seconds]
Millicycle = 50 Nanocycles (1.5 minutes) [0.0002227272727... seconds]
Minicycle = 80 Millicycles (two hours) [0.01818181818... seconds]
Microcycle = 11 Minicycles (one day) [0.0909090909090... seconds]
Standard Cycle = 100 Microcycles [probably one second in the real world]

words of wisdom from...

PranKsTeR BiT V2.0



 
foilism
User

Posts: 1,064
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 7:13 AM
Prankster bit Wrote:
Compucore Wrote: IN the digital world I think its mainly in Cycles. For every so many cycles. is equivilant to xx number of seconds or fractions of a second.

i'm quoting this from Harpo on TU. i think he made it up, but it seems to fit quite well [if you read this, harpo and you didn't make it up. i stand corrected.], the curved brackets are his estimated conversions for telling time in role, and the square brackets are what i think they would roughly compare to in the real world.anyway, here:

Nanocycle = 2 seconds [0.0000045454545454545 seconds]
Millicycle = 50 Nanocycles (1.5 minutes) [0.0002227272727... seconds]
Minicycle = 80 Millicycles (two hours) [0.01818181818... seconds]
Microcycle = 11 Minicycles (one day) [0.0909090909090... seconds]
Standard Cycle = 100 Microcycles [probably one second in the real world]

Thats nice and precise, so what you're saying is that Flynn's adventures can't add up to much real time at all - v. interesting.



 
Conduit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 10:07 AM
Prankster bit Wrote:
Compucore Wrote: IN the digital world I think its mainly in Cycles. For every so many cycles. is equivilant to xx number of seconds or fractions of a second.

i'm quoting this from Harpo on TU. i think he made it up, but it seems to fit quite well [if you read this, harpo and you didn't make it up. i stand corrected.], the curved brackets are his estimated conversions for telling time in role, and the square brackets are what i think they would roughly compare to in the real world.anyway, here:

Nanocycle = 2 seconds [0.0000045454545454545 seconds]
Millicycle = 50 Nanocycles (1.5 minutes) [0.0002227272727... seconds]
Minicycle = 80 Millicycles (two hours) [0.01818181818... seconds]
Microcycle = 11 Minicycles (one day) [0.0909090909090... seconds]
Standard Cycle = 100 Microcycles [probably one second in the real world]

That doesn't add up with evidence presented in Tron 2.0. For example, a program says that Romie was "so young, so many cycles left." Last time I checked, programs usually remain installed longer than a matter of seconds.

Another thing, if one second in the real world is 100 days in the digital world, that means that in the original Tron, Alan gave Tron the command and data to destroy the MCP at what is for all intents and purposes, the exact same moment Flynn was digitized! It's strange Alan didn't mention anything about plans to destroy the MCP.

And with this time scale, can you imagine what it would be like for programs if someone left a computer unattended? They would be left for millions of years just running the same routines. I can't imagine any intelligent life not going insane after being put through that. I can accept time going faster in the digital world, but that rate is way too fast.where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online


 
Prankster bit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 11:43 AM
Conduit Wrote:

That doesn't add up with evidence presented in Tron 2.0. For example, a program says that Romie was "so young, so many cycles left." Last time I checked, programs usually remain installed longer than a matter of seconds.

Another thing, if one second in the real world is 100 days in the digital world, that means that in the original Tron, Alan gave Tron the command and data to destroy the MCP at what is for all intents and purposes, the exact same moment Flynn was digitized! It's strange Alan didn't mention anything about plans to destroy the MCP.

And with this time scale, can you imagine what it would be like for programs if someone left a computer unattended? They would be left for millions of years just running the same routines. I can't imagine any intelligent life not going insane after being put through that. I can accept time going faster in the digital world, but that rate is way too fast.

i was actually guessing as to the real world comparisons. and we also don't know the "lifespan" of a standard program. i-no looks about 75, but how much time has passed in the digital world since the MCP. is i-no was nearly captured [and i remember that all the programs that were captured were elderly] then that would mean that not much time has passed since the MCP "incident".
order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

words of wisdom from...

PranKsTeR BiT V2.0



 
Kamui
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 12:27 PM
Boingo_Buzzard Wrote:

Don't they allude to the fact that time passes more quickly in the computer world in the Tron 2.0 GBA game?

Plus in the movie we see Flynn pass out for a while. How long was he out? We're not sure how much time passed there.

I feel that time would pass "slower" in the computer world.... meaning that you could digitize yourself and come back out in what seemed like 40 years to find that only a fraction of time had passed.

You, of course, would be exactly the same as when you were digitized.

Could be an effective means of travelling into the future, given there is anyone there to pull you out when you want to be extracted.


This sorta reminds me of Einstein's theory of relativety (or at least i think this was it..... it was the time-travaly one I'm thinking of here. User! I'm so bad today! ^^;; ) where if you were in space, time would pass by a little slower to ther point that you're actually going back in time 9I think you can go back as far as either 3 mins or 3 secs) while on Earth, time would pass normally So the person in space would be younger than the person on earth.

So I'm thinking that this would be a very similar scenario to that of digitization.

~Kamui.EXE


===========================
What should I put here today?
http://mediamaniacgeek.blogspot.com/
TALES OF A MEDIA GEEK
 
foilism
User

Posts: 1,064
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 2:19 PM
just watched some more of the movie with this in mind and I acme to the bit where Flynn is 'hacking' using crom in his tank. he's communicating through the text right - so how comes crom seems to be in real time there?? i don't get it.where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill onlineabortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion


 
Prankster bit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 2:39 PM
foilism Wrote:just watched some more of the movie with this in mind and I acme to the bit where Flynn is 'hacking' using crom in his tank. he's communicating through the text right - so how comes crom seems to be in real time there?? i don't get it.

maybe the digital world can change speeds, like a cd drive.where to buy abortion pill http://blog.bitimpulse.com/template/default.aspx?abortion-types buy abortion pill online

words of wisdom from...

PranKsTeR BiT V2.0



 
foilism
User

Posts: 1,064
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 3:00 PM
lol, thats a bit easy though ain't it?


 
Prankster bit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 3:28 PM
foilism Wrote:lol, thats a bit easy though ain't it?

i don't know! i've lost my philosophical streak. i'm shooting in the dark now!order abortion pill abortion pill buy online where to buy abortion pill

words of wisdom from...

PranKsTeR BiT V2.0



 
foilism
User

Posts: 1,064
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 5:12 PM
Prankster bit Wrote:
i don't know! i've lost my philosophical streak. i'm shooting in the dark now!

Lol, very honest of you!



 
Compucore
User

Posts: 4,450
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 7:54 PM
Masybe he may be communicating to Flyn Via the communication console that was of to the side just before he sits down in th main seat there to drive the tank or fire the cannon.



Prankster bit Wrote:
foilism Wrote:just watched some more of the movie with this in mind and I acme to the bit where Flynn is 'hacking' using crom in his tank. he's communicating through the text right - so how comes crom seems to be in real time there?? i don't get it.

maybe the digital world can change speeds, like a cd drive.


2 Legit 2 quit

End of line

Compucore

VROOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!

To compute or not to compute that is the question at hand. Tis nobler to compile in C++ or in TASM.


 
Boingo_Buzzard
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 10:17 PM
foilism Wrote:just watched some more of the movie with this in mind and I acme to the bit where Flynn is 'hacking' using crom in his tank. he's communicating through the text right - so how comes crom seems to be in real time there?? i don't get it.

Perhaps it was "edited" for content. Meaning that Clu's actual traverse through the whole game grid and whatnot in search of data could have seemed a lot longer, but the scenes we saw as viewers matched up with Flynn on the other end giving commands.





 
Traahn
User

Posts: 3,305
Re: Real time?

on Wednesday, June, 01, 2005 11:41 PM
Ahh, but we're forgetting one key line from the movie. Ram says to Crom: "Hey, what's going on in the other sectors? I've been stuck in this Grid for 200 microcycles now."

So, it sounds like 200 microcycles is a fairly long time for them. There's still no knowing how long this is in relation to their entire life-span... but does this help at all?

For what it's worth, I don't think Tron is "real-time" like a season of the "24" TV series or something abortion pills online abortion pill online purchase cytotec abortion


I'm getting out of here right now, and you guys are invited. -----^
 
Conduit
User

Posts: 0
Re: Real time?

on Thursday, June, 02, 2005 9:58 AM
Prankster bit Wrote:
i was actually guessing as to the real world comparisons. and we also don't know the "lifespan" of a standard program. i-no looks about 75, but how much time has passed in the digital world since the MCP. is i-no was nearly captured [and i remember that all the programs that were captured were elderly] then that would mean that not much time has passed since the MCP "incident".

A program's life span is however long it lasts before it's obsolete, at which point we delete it. This varies from program to program. Since all of the programs captured by the MCP were elderly, their elderly appearance is probably a side effect of the MCP capturing them and not of age. One thing you have to remember about I-no is that his system has been down for a long time, and I don't think time passes in the digital world while the computer is off, at least not in the sense that anything happens.


 
 Page: of 1 Page
New New Comments | Post No Change | Locked Closed
Forums 
  General Discussion 
 Real time?